= FAQ
// Metadata
:description: TEMPLATE
:keywords: TEMPLATE
// GitHub compatible auto-generated IDs
:idprefix:
:idseparator: -
// Sitewide Settings
:docinfodir: docinfo
:experimental:
:hide-uri-scheme:
:icons:
:icontype: svg
:iconsdir: ../../assets/icons
:imagesdir: images
:img-width-std: width='250'
:stylesdir: css
:stylesheet: page.css
:toc: left
:toclevels: 5
:stem:
:sectanchors:
// Page Settings
:nofooter:
:docinfo: shared
:navtitle: About
:reftext: About
:toc-title: About
// URIs
:uri-the-unlicense: https://unlicense.org/

include::../../partials/navbar.html[]

[quote, Bertrant Russell]
Liberty is the right to do what I like; license, the right to do what you like.

== FAQ...

There are no questions, and thus no answers. This page is only here to give that drop-down link in the navbar something to point to. Oh, wait, perhaps this:

=== Under which license has this magnificent intwerwebs page boilerplate been published?

You're kidding, right? Too right.
Slapping a license with restrictions of any kind on a code seems to me to be an exercise in futility.
Who's going to enforce Attribution, Share Alike, or even a GPL?
I have better things to do, my friend, and if you're not going to enforce it--and nobody does--then why the license? +
Please don't say silly things like 'honesty', and 'in good faith'...

So, I’ve saved myself the worry: The whole kit 'n caboodle lives under the burden of icon:custom/unlicense[width=20]
link:{uri-the-unlicense}[The Unlicense,window=_blank].

Just let go.
